Three individuals were arrested in UP’s Ghaziabad under the anti-conversion law.
In Uttar Pradesh, three individuals have been arrested by the state police under the anti-conversion law for allegedly converting several people to Islam. The arrested men, identified as Mohammad Rahil alias Rahul, Museer, and Abdullah Ahmed alias Saurabh Khurana, were apprehended from different locations, according to a police statement.
The investigation into the case was initiated following a complaint lodged by a man who alleged that a person named Rahul, working with his daughter, was attempting to convert her to Islam. The complainant, who approached the Khoda Police, expressed concern that his daughter had suddenly started following Islamic rituals and was on the verge of embracing the religion.
Speaking to reporters, Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Vivek Chandra Yadav of Trans Hindan stated that the police had launched an inquiry based on the complaint. During the interrogation, it was discovered that Rahul had converted to Islam in 2017 and had since been using his “lover boy” persona to entice Hindu girls, according to Yadav.
The arrests were made under the anti-conversion law implemented by the Uttar Pradesh government. The law, officially known as the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance 2020, seeks to prevent forced conversions or conversions done by fraudulent means. It requires individuals who intend to convert to a different religion to provide prior notice to the district magistrate, who will then conduct an inquiry to ensure the conversion is voluntary and not coerced.
The anti-conversion law has attracted both support and criticism. Proponents argue that it protects vulnerable individuals from being coerced or manipulated into converting their religion. They contend that the law preserves religious freedom by ensuring conversions are conducted without force or fraudulent means. On the other hand, critics argue that the law infringes on individual rights and interferes with personal choices regarding faith and belief. They contend that it specifically targets religious minorities and may be used to harass and persecute marginalised communities.
The implementation of the law has resulted in several arrests across Uttar Pradesh since its enactment. Critics expressed concerns that the legislation could be misused and may create an atmosphere of fear and hostility towards religious minorities. Supporters, however, maintain that the law is necessary to curb forced conversions and protect vulnerable individuals, particularly women.
The arrests of Mohammad Rahil alias Rahul, Museer, and Abdullah Ahmed alias Saurabh Khurana highlight the efforts of the Uttar Pradesh Police to enforce the anti-conversion law. The police’s swift action in response to the complaint demonstrates their commitment to investigating allegations of forced conversions and ensuring compliance with the legal framework.
As the investigation progresses, it will be crucial to determine the veracity of the allegations and gather evidence to support the charges against the arrested individuals. The court will ultimately decide their guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented. It is essential to adhere to the principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law throughout the legal proceedings.
The case also raises broader questions about religious freedom, individual autonomy, and the balance between the state’s role in protecting citizens and safeguarding their rights. It is essential for lawmakers and society as a whole to engage in constructive dialogue to address these complex issues and find a balance that respects both religious freedom and the need to prevent coercion or fraudulent practices in religious conversions.
In conclusion, the Uttar Pradesh Police have arrested three men under the state’s anti-conversion law for allegedly converting individuals to Islam. The arrests were made following a complaint by a man who accused one of the arrested individuals of attempting to convert his daughter. The implementation of the anti-conversion law has sparked debates about religious freedom, individual rights, and the state’s role in regulating religious conversions. As the legal proceedings unfold, it is crucial to uphold the principles of justice and fairness to ensure a just resolution to the case.
The Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) made a startling revelation, stating that Rahul, the accused, had entered into an online marriage with the alleged victim, despite already having performed a ‘nikah’ ceremony with Abdullah Ahmed’s sister-in-law. Both Rahul and Abdullah Ahmed, who also went by the name Saurabh Khurana, were converts to Islam.
Abdullah embraced Islam during his time studying BDS at the renowned Aligarh Muslim University back in 2014. Over the years, he had managed to influence and convert several other individuals who had come into contact with him, according to the DCP.
In light of these events, the three individuals involved were charged under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. This act was enacted to prevent forced conversions and illegal religious conversions in the state of Uttar Pradesh. It aimed to safeguard the freedom of religion while discouraging any form of coercion or fraud in religious conversions.
The case presented a complex web of relationships and alleged religious conversions. Rahul, having already performed a ‘nikah’ with Abdullah Ahmed’s sister-in-law, proceeded to marry the purported victim through an online ceremony. The DCP’s statement suggested that this act may have been an attempt to circumvent legal or social barriers.